происходжение видов
20:26 | 13-11-2011 | Literature | 2 Comments
я всегда говорил, что фантастика — это в первую очередь футурология. но все немного глубже, и Гибсон очень верно подмечает эту разницу:
INTERVIEWER: Do you think fiction should be predictive?
GIBSON: No, I don’t. Or not particularly. The record of futurism in science fiction is actually quite shabby, it seems to me. Used bookstores are full of visionary texts we’ve never heard of, usually for perfectly good reasons.
INTERVIEWER: You’ve written that science fiction is never about the future, that it is always instead a treatment of the present.
GIBSON: There are dedicated futurists who feel very seriously that they are extrapolating a future history. My position is that you can’t do that without having the present to stand on. Nobody can know the real future. And novels set in imaginary futures are necessarily about the moment in which they are written. As soon as a work is complete, it will begin to acquire a patina of anachronism. I know that from the moment I add the final period, the text is moving steadily forward into the real future.
There was an effort in the seventies to lose the usage science fiction and champion speculative fiction. Of course, all fiction is speculative, and all history, too—endlessly subject to revision. Particularly given all of the emerging technology today, in a hundred years the long span of human history will look fabulously different from the version we have now. If things go on the way they’re going, and technology keeps emerging, we’ll eventually have a near-total sorting of humanity’s attic.
In my lifetime I’ve been able to watch completely different narratives of history emerge. The history now of what World War II was about and how it actually took place is radically different from the history I was taught in elementary school. If you read the Victorians writing about themselves, they’re describing something that never existed. The Victorians didn’t think of themselves as sexually repressed, and they didn’t think of themselves as racist. They didn’t think of themselves as colonialists. They thought of themselves as the crown of creation.
Of course, we might be Victorians, too.
именно, ты исследуешь не будущее само по себе, но совокупность времени на сегодняшний день. так, парадоксально, но и “Барочный цикл”, к примеру, — он тоже футурологичен.
[…] созвучие. вообще, из всех известных мне жанров фантастика […]
еще: http://boingboing.net/2012/09/13/william-gibson-explains-why-sc.html